Illinois: FQHC Healthcare Economics

UCLA-RAND CalAIM PATH / Community Supports Interim Evaluation

A UCLA-RAND interim evaluation released May 2026 found CalAIM's Enhanced Care Management (ECM) and Community Supports grew from 82,088 members in early 2022 to 256,406 active members by Q3 2024, with 500,447 ever-served — growth driven in part by PATH infrastructure funding to community-based providers including FQHCs. It is the most authoritative state-evaluation evidence yet that the ECM/Community Supports model scaled, strengthening the case for FQHC investment ahead of the December 2026 CalAIM waiver decision.

DHCS — CalAIM Community Supports Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

DHCS published the first quantified cost-effectiveness analysis of CalAIM Community Supports: 9 of 12 services already cost-effective within the study period; the remaining 3 are projected cost-effective over longer time horizons. Headline finding: Housing Deposits reduced applicable service costs by 31.6%. The DHCS fact sheet gives FQHC CFOs a state-published, source-of-truth justification for investing in ECM/Community Supports infrastructure ahead of the CalAIM 1115 waiver renewal (Dec 31, 2026 expiry). Pairs with the Maryland FPCC Milbank 3:1 ROI peer-reviewed study to form an 'ECM + CS works' evidence package for board-level investment decisions. Note: existing CLAUDE.md tracks 15 Community Supports (including Transitional Rent mandatory Jan 1 2026); the DHCS fact sheet references 12 — likely pre-Transitional Rent count or a different categorization.

Maryland FQHC Primary Care Collaborative (7-FQHC consortium)

A 3-year peer-reviewed assessment of the Maryland FQHC Primary Care Collaborative (FPCC) — a 7-FQHC consortium operating under a Medicaid alternative payment model — quantifies the strongest published FQHC value-based-care ROI to date. Total infrastructure investment of $4.4M generated $19.4M in cumulative savings for Medicaid beneficiaries (3:1 ROI) alongside 35% reduction in emergency department visits and 11% reduction in hospitalizations. The Milbank Memorial Fund analysis directly rebuts the Penn LDI 'teacup in a roaring sea' framing with hard outcome data showing a small consortium can move utilization meaningfully when the payment model + infrastructure are aligned. Highly transferable to a similar-size CA FQHC group (e.g., a 5-7-clinic East Bay or Central Valley cluster) considering APM participation.

Carina Health Network — Colorado FQHC-MSSP ACO

Carina Health Network — a Colorado-based FQHC-governed ACO — supports all 19 Colorado community health centers with data infrastructure, technology, and practice transformation. It achieved $17.6M+ in Medicare savings across ~12,000 attributed beneficiaries via Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) participation. Geographically diversifies the C3 (Massachusetts) FQHC-governed ACO model — proof that the network-of-FQHCs MSSP playbook is replicable in the Mountain West, not just New England. For California Medicare-attributed FQHCs considering MSSP entry, Carina + C3 + Aledade are the three reference architectures: state PCA-anchored network (Carina), multi-state FQHC-governed coop (C3), or partner with a national MSO (Aledade).