NACHC and PhRMA Split on 340B Reform Discussion Draft — Health Centers Reject Manufacturer Audit Provisions as 'Program-Gutting' Threat
Congressional staff circulated a 340B reform discussion draft that would grant manufacturers new audit rights over covered entities in exchange for limiting contract pharmacy restrictions. NACHC and 340B Health immediately rejected the draft, arguing that expanded manufacturer audit rights would allow pharmaceutical companies to dispute patient eligibility across virtually any dispensing event — effectively gutting the program. PhRMA endorsed the framework. The conflict signals that 340B reform language could be attached to the reconciliation bill as a deficit reduction mechanism, requiring FQHCs to fight simultaneously on Medicaid and drug savings fronts.
Key takeaways
- If your FQHC participates in 340B: contact your Congressional delegation now to oppose manufacturer audit provisions — this is a NACHC red line and the draft is actively advancing
- Monitor reconciliation bill text closely for 340B rider language — it could be attached as a 'savings' provision targeting health center drug program revenue in the deficit reduction package
Primary source
340B HealthFQHC Talent. (2026, April 15). NACHC and PhRMA Split on 340B Reform Discussion Draft — Health Centers Reject Manufacturer Audit Provisions as 'Program-Gutting' Threat. Primary source: 340B Health. Retrieved April 28, 2026, from https://www.fqhctalent.com/intel/nachc-pharma-340b-compromise-split-2026
More in Lobbying & Advocacy
Apr 20
AHA Files Formal Opposition to HRSA 340B Rebate Model — FQHC/Hospital Alignment on 'Flawed Mechanism'
Apr 14
NACHC Activates National In-District Advocacy Week April 14–25 — FQHCs Hosting Congress During Recess
Apr 11
Alameda County Launches 'Fight for Medi-Cal' Coalition with 30+ Organizations — Coordinated District-Level Pressure on House Republicans Through 2026 Election
Apr 10
CCALAC + Coalition of OC Community Health Centers Convene Joint Vision Summit — SoCal FQHC Alliance