National Analysis
The Expansion Divide: How 9 States Carry America's FQHC Uninsured Burden
June 3, 2026 · 6 min read · Source: HRSA UDS 2024
TL;DR
- • Across 1,228 community health centers outside California and Texas — 14,992 sites, 25.5M patients — the safety net is not uniform.
- • In the 9 states that never expanded Medicaid, FQHCs run 26.5% uninsured — 9.8 points higher than the 16.7% in expansion states.
- • As the enhanced ACA premium tax credits expire at the end of 2025, that gap is set to widen in exactly these states — and FQHCs absorb it.
Every Federally Qualified Health Center serves everyone who walks in, regardless of ability to pay. But who walks in — and how they're covered — depends enormously on a decision each state made years ago: whether to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. HRSA's 2024 Uniform Data System makes the consequence measurable.
The national footprint
Outside California and Texas — the two states we track in depth — there are 1,228 FQHC organizations operating 14,992 service sites across 57 states and territories, serving 25.5M patients a year. Nationally, their payer mix is 44.4% Medicaid, 18.4% uninsured, and 12.2% Medicare. That national average hides the real story.
The divide
Split those health centers by their state's Medicaid decision and two different safety nets appear:
| Expansion | Non-expansion | |
|---|---|---|
| States | 40 | 9 |
| Health centers | 968 | 227 |
| Patients | 20.3M | 4.6M |
| Uninsured | 16.7% | 26.5% |
| Medicaid | 46.4% | 33.6% |
The uninsured share runs 9.8 percentage points higher at non-expansion-state FQHCs, while Medicaid — the program that pays for care in expansion states — falls from 46.4% to 33.6%. The coverage the ACA was designed to provide simply isn't there, so the health center becomes the coverage of last resort. The 9 non-expansion states are Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
Why the timing matters
The enhanced ACA Marketplace premium tax credits — which made Marketplace coverage affordable for millions since 2021 — are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. When they lapse, premiums jump and coverage falls fastest among the working-poor population that non-expansion states leave in the gap: too much income for limited Medicaid, too little to afford an unsubsidized plan. Those patients don't disappear. They show up at the FQHC, uninsured.
Florida is the largest non-expansion state in this analysis — and its FQHCs carry one of the heaviest uninsured loads in the country. It is the bellwether for what premium-credit expiry does to a non-expansion safety net.
What FQHC leaders should watch
If you lead a health center in a non-expansion state, your exposure isn't the Medicaid work requirements that dominate expansion-state planning — it's the self-pay and sliding-fee line. Three things to model now: the share of your panel on subsidized Marketplace plans that lapse in 2026; your 340B savings, which scale with the volume that keeps the doors open; and your state's posture on any partial-coverage workaround. The expansion divide isn't abstract policy — it's the payer mix on next year's budget.
Primary sources
- HRSA Uniform Data System (UDS) 2024 — patients + payer mix
- KFF — Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
- KFF — Enhanced ACA premium tax credit expiry (2026)
Figures computed live from our national dataset (HRSA UDS 2024), patient-weighted. Excludes California and Texas, which have dedicated state dashboards.