We name real organizations and publish real numbers. Here is the standard we hold ourselves to — and how to tell us when we get something wrong.
Our sourcing standard
- Every intelligence item, layoff entry, and impact figure links to a primary source — government records, court filings, the organization's own statements, or established journalism. We prefer government and policy-organization sources over news aggregation.
- Projections are labeled as projections, estimates as estimates, and allegations as allegations. We distinguish confirmed counts from modeled figures (see the confidence labels on the Impact Tracker).
- WARN Act layoff entries reflect public filings; where an organization disputes or updates a filing, we update the entry and note the change.
- Editorial content is AI-assisted and human-curated, as disclosed in our Terms of Service. The sourcing standard applies regardless of how a draft was produced.
Request a correction
If we have published something inaccurate about your organization — or any factual error — email hello@fqhctalent.com with the page URL, the statement at issue, and the correct information (with a source if available). Corrections from named organizations are prioritized and typically reviewed within 2 business days.
How corrections are published
- Material factual errors: we correct the page and add a dated editorial note describing what changed (see the update banners on time-sensitive articles).
- Minor errors (typos, formatting, broken links): fixed silently.
- Superseded facts: fast-moving stories (election counts, pending rulings) are updated in place with the new date; the original framing is preserved where it matters for the record.
See also: Terms of Service · Privacy Policy