Loading...
Loading...
Regional dashboard covering 11 Federally Qualified Health Centers across 109 sites in the Sacramento region.
This strategic report is analysis compiled from public sources (HRSA UDS, CMS, WARN Act filings, news coverage, public Glassdoor reviews). Claims about workforce stability, financial positioning, or operational resilience are informational only and may not reflect current operations. For authoritative information, contact the organization directly.
The most important things to know about Sacramento right now. Tap a bullet to jump to the underlying section.
11
across 109 sites
2,218
avg 202 per FQHC
None
No layoffs tracked
3.2/5
9 of 11 rated
How this region compares against the statewide average across the metrics that matter most.
Resilience
70/100
Glassdoor
3.2/5
Open Jobs / FQHC
5
Coverage Vulnerability
31%
FQHCs grouped by exposure to layoffs, low resilience, and H.R. 1 funding impact. Combines resilience score, layoff history, coverage vulnerability, and funding-impact level.
Sacramento · Grade D (45/100)
Sacramento · Grade C (60/100)
65% patients at coverage risk
Winters · Grade C (61/100)
65% patients at coverage risk
Sacramento · Grade C (63/100)
65% patients at coverage risk
Citrus Heights · Grade B (72/100)
Moderate exposure
Sacramento · Grade B (73/100)
Moderate exposure
Davis · Grade B (79/100)
Moderate exposure
Yuba City · Grade A (84/100)
Sacramento · Grade A (80/100)
Sacramento · Grade B (78/100)
Sacramento · Grade B (72/100)
Average resilience score: 70/100. Distribution of grades across 11 FQHCs.
Search by name or city. Sort any column. Filter by resilience grade or H.R. 1 funding impact.
11 of 11 FQHCs
| Ampla Health - Sacramento Yuba City | Yuba City | 250 | A | 3.7 | 4 |
| WellSpace Health Sacramento | Sacramento | 375 | A | 2.8 | 5 |
| CommuniCare Health Centers Davis | Davis | 200 | B | 3.6 | 4 |
| Sacramento Native American Health Center Sacramento | Sacramento | 70 | B | 3.2 | 4 |
| Elica Health Centers Sacramento | Sacramento | 600 | B | 2.9 | 12 |
| One Community Health Sacramento | Sacramento | 135 | B | 2.4 | 3 |
| Sierra Vista Community Health Citrus Heights | Citrus Heights | 110 | B | — | 3 |
| Health and Life Organization, (h.a.l.o) Sacramento | Sacramento | 391 | C | 4.2 | 6 |
| Winters Healthcare Foundation Winters | Winters | 87 | C | — | 10 |
| Sacramento County Health Center Sacramento | Sacramento | — | C | 3.7 | 8 |
| Cares Community HealthH.R. 1 Sacramento | Sacramento | — | D | 2.5 | 9 |
53 open jobs across 11 FQHCs. No tracked layoffs in the region.
Union organizing, NLRB cases, contract negotiations, strikes, and ballot measures touching FQHCs in this region. Statewide CA cases included.
2,400 Kaiser mental health therapists (NUHW) struck March 18, 2026 across Bay Area, Central Valley, and Sacramento. Key issues: AI replacement fears, chronic understaffing, and Kaiser's $200M DMHC settlement. Kaiser's 21.5% raise from the Jan-Feb nursing strike sets a wage benchmark FQHCs cannot match, potentially widening the compensation gap. However, the AI replacement narrative could push BH professionals toward FQHCs where clinician autonomy is higher.
Next: Jun 15 — Strike enters 9th month — NUHW staged FIRST act of civil disobedience April 30 (Session 32, day after Newsom-requested mediation). Kaiser presented no new proposals. Strategic escalation, political pressure intensifying. NUHW expanded organizing wins (1,300 new members / 9 facilities past 12 months including Imperial Beach Community Clinic FQHC) gives leverage. Newsom-requested mediation acceptance remains the swing variable. Watch for additional civil disobedience actions and any Kaiser counter-proposal in May/June.
NUHWSEIU-UHW submitted signatures April 3 for Initiative #25-0008 requiring FQHCs to spend 90% of revenue on 'mission-related expenses.' A Berkeley Research Group study commissioned by Protect Patients CA finds this would redirect $1.7B from community health centers and push two-thirds into operating deficits. The 90% threshold would exclude spending on nurse/physician managers, translation services, enrollment navigators, transportation, community outreach, and new clinic construction. CMA, CPCA, CCALAC, AltaMed, and FHCSD lead the opposition.
Next: Jun 25 — County signature verification deadline — Secretary of State expected to announce qualification by early summer 2026
BallotpediaCompanion measure to #25-0008 capping healthcare executive compensation at $450,000 with a 3.5% annual escalator. Submitted alongside the 90% spending mandate. Together, the two measures would fundamentally restructure how FQHCs allocate resources and compensate leadership.
Next: Jun 25 — County signature verification deadline — Secretary of State expected to announce qualification by early summer 2026
BallotpediaAB 1113 pursues the same 90% mission-spend ratio through the legislature rather than the ballot box. FQHCs must report total revenues by June 30, 2026, using IRS Form 990 Line 25 (Column B, Part IX) as the basis. DHCS must adopt implementation methodology by January 1, 2027. Includes annual registration fees to fund enforcement. This is a two-pronged SEIU-UHW strategy: AB 1113 through the legislature + the ballot measure as backup/pressure. Opposition campaign active at stopab1113.com.
Next: Jun 30 — FQHCs must report total revenues to department
CA LegislatureSEIU-UHW leads a ballot drive for a one-time 5% wealth tax on California's ~200 billionaires (~$2T combined wealth), projected to generate $100B over 5 years. 90% would fund healthcare programs. If passed, this could be the largest state-level healthcare funding mechanism in US history and would directly offset H.R. 1 Medicaid cuts. This is a rare case where SEIU and FQHCs have aligned interests — more healthcare funding benefits both workers and employers.
Next: Apr 30 — Signature collection deadline (Regan target)
SEIU-UHWGovernor Newsom signed AB 288 in September 2025 to allow California's PERB to process unfair labor practice charges and conduct union elections for private-sector employers — including FQHCs — when the NLRB cannot act, lacks a quorum, or faces significant delays. A federal judge issued a partial preliminary injunction on December 26, 2025, blocking PERB from stepping in for cases where the NLRB is merely delayed or lacks a quorum (on federal preemption grounds). The law is on appeal to the 9th Circuit. If AB 288 survives appeal, California can enforce labor law at FQHCs even if the NLRB is defunded or paralyzed under the current federal administration — a critical backstop for organizing drives like Innercare. If struck down, FQHCs facing organizing would have reduced oversight.
Next: Dec 31 — 9th Circuit appeal ruling (date TBD) — determines whether CA can enforce labor law at FQHCs if NLRB is weakened
California Employment Law Update (Proskauer)+ 1 more cases tracked
Coalition actions, ballot initiatives, lawsuits, and legislation actively defending FQHC funding and patients in this region.
The Health4All coalition (CPEHN, California Academy of Family Physicians, CRLAF, immigrant rights organizations) is mobilizing to block Governor Newsom's expected May 14 May Revision proposal to cut $1.1B in additional Medi-Cal funding targeting full-scope coverage for ~200,000 immigrant DV/trafficking survivors and to extend work requirements to state-only programs. Compounds the already-tracked UIS PPS elimination (July 1, 2026), $30/month undocumented adult premium (July 1, 2027), and dental benefits removal. Strategic implication: testimony window through approximately June 15 budget conference committee. CPCA-aligned FQHC executives should brief boards on multi-cliff revenue exposure before signing FY26-27 budgets.
Follow-up: Jun 15, 2026
CPEHNNACHC and Advocates for Community Health (ACH) — historically split on 340B reform direction — publicly set aside their differences in May 2026 for a joint Congressional ask to extend mandatory CHC funding past the January 30, 2026 expiration. Notable because the two organizations disagreed publicly in March 2026 on a 340B compromise bill. Setting differences aside signals existential urgency around the funding cliff. Strategic implication: a unified NACHC + ACH front strengthens FY27 appropriations advocacy at a critical moment. FQHC executives should align CPCA + state PCA messaging with the NACHC+ACH unified ask rather than running parallel independent tracks.
Follow-up: Sep 30, 2026
340B ReportNACHC announced its second 2026 in-district mobilization window: May 24 – June 1, 2026, targeting Members of Congress in their home districts to preserve health center mandatory funding ahead of the December 2026 expiration cliff. Builds on the April in-district window, with bipartisan reconciliation negotiators as the priority audience. NACHC frames the ask around its $7B Senate Finance testimony figure (7.6M patients, 1-in-5 closure scenario). Strategic implication: FQHC CEOs and government affairs leads should plan in-district visits for the May 24 - June 1 window, coordinate messaging with CPCA and CCALAC, and leverage local newspaper editorial boards in this period.
Follow-up: Jun 1, 2026
NACHCCalifornia Assembly Democrats released their 2026-27 budget road map around May 7, 2026 (one week before Newsom's May Revise on May 14), declaring: 'In 2026 we will draw a line in the sand, defending the safety net programs such as in-home care, healthcare and dental care, and food aid.' Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel are signaling Assembly resistance to UIS Medi-Cal cuts, $1B Medi-Cal Dental cut, enrollment freeze, and IHSS reductions. Paired with the Senate's mid-April equivalent proposal, this creates a bicameral counter-position against the Governor's January budget and forecasted May Revise. FQHC implications: formal legislative resistance to enrollment freeze, $30 UIS premium, dental cuts — all directly impact FQHC revenue cycles. June 15 budget adoption deadline.
Follow-up: May 14, 2026
California Assembly Budget CommitteeBuilding on the ~1M signatures filed April 27, the CalChamber-led 'Affordable California' coalition formally announced (May 6, 2026) that 100+ organizations — including business groups, taxpayer associations, and California Hospital Association — have joined the campaign. Marks the shift from signature-collection phase to coalition-mobilization phase ahead of the June 25 signature verification deadline. Direct counter to SEIU-UHW's twin pressure (90% Mission Spend ballot + Healthcare Executive Compensation Act + AB 1113). FQHC governance teams should: (1) review the public coalition lineup — many CalChamber-aligned orgs are also FQHC business partners; (2) align CCALAC/CPCA opposition messaging with the broader 'cost-impact' frame already running in CalChamber comms; (3) pre-position November 2026 voter education materials for both competing measures (likely to split voter attention).
Follow-up: Jun 25, 2026
CalChamberA coalition of health consumer advocates released 'Medi-Cal 2030: Person-Centered, Accountable, Sustainable' principles on May 5, 2026 — explicitly framed to guide policymakers in the May Revise (May 14) and June 15 budget adoption. Coalition members include Health Access California, National Health Law Program (NHeLP), Western Center on Law & Poverty, plus health consumer organizations representing communities of color, children, and older adults. Principles eliminate exclusions, remove discriminatory barriers, and guarantee comprehensive care across the lifespan with immigration status never as a barrier. Released 9 days before the May Revise and 41 days before budget adoption. Strategic pairing: while the CHCF-led Future of Medi-Cal Commission develops a January 2027 10-year roadmap, this advocacy coalition pushes near-term budget protection. FQHC executives should reference these principles in board materials and CPCA testimony — enrollment freeze, UIS dental, $30 premium are all targeted.
Follow-up: May 15, 2026
National Health Law ProgramAI implementation news and case studies that mention this region or its FQHCs.
California Health Care Foundation (CHCF) published its Sacramento policy briefing 'Health AI Policymaking: Key Themes' April 2026 — the first formal CHCF positioning on California AI governance. Establishes themes for the 177+ state health-AI bills already noted: oversight committees, bias monitoring, transparency requirements, vendor accountability. Pairs with already-tracked HAIP April 2026 governance brief. Strategic implication: California is moving toward a state-level AI governance framework distinct from federal — FQHCs already constrained by HRSA + Medi-Cal compliance now face a third layer. CHCF's framing typically becomes DHCS framing within 12-18 months. FQHC executives should treat this as the early signal of what AI governance compliance will look like by 2027.
California Health Care Foundation · Apr 2026Sacramento Native American Health Center (SNAHC) adopted AI medical scribes to reduce clinician documentation burden, becoming one of the first tribal health centers in California to implement ambient AI. The adoption addresses a critical challenge: SNAHC providers serve urban Native American, Alaska Native, and surrounding communities with complex care needs, and after-hours documentation was consuming significant provider time. Key lessons: ensure cultural sensitivity in AI-generated content for Native populations, integrate outputs directly into EHR workflows, and start with willing champions before expanding.
Sacramento Native American Health Center · Aug 202524 intelligence items relevant to this region.
AFSCME Local 3299 (42,000 University of California service and patient-care technical workers) begins an open-ended strike on May 14, 2026 over housing affordability and healthcare premium costs. UCSF, UC Davis, UC San Diego, UCLA, and UC Irvine hospital operations face significant disruption. FQHCs in UC catchment areas (San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange County) should expect patient spillover — particularly for primary care visits diverted from UC ambulatory clinics. Strategic implication: (1) Operations directors should brief front-line staff on expected demand surge starting May 14, (2) Establish referral channels with UC discharge planners for safety-net patients losing continuity, (3) Coordinate with CPCA/CCALAC for regional capacity messaging, (4) Track strike duration — open-ended posture means weeks-to-months potential exposure. Compounds existing AHS, Kaiser, and WellSpace capacity pressures across the state.
Sacramento County DHS Director Timothy Lutz quantified the H.R. 1 cost-shift to county safety nets: 73,000 county residents will lose Medi-Cal coverage in the next year, with 6,500 becoming the county's indigent care responsibility — 'tens of millions of dollars' that the county must absorb. This is the precise pipeline that will drive uninsured walk-ins to WellSpace Health, Elica Health Centers, One Community Health, CommuniCare Health Centers, and Health for All. Through CSAC and CWDA, California's 58 counties are asking the state for $1.9B in FY2026-27 + $4.5B in FY2027-28 to offset the cost-shift. This ask is timed to the May 14 May Revise budget release. Strategic implication for Sacramento-region FQHCs: model FY2026-27 patient mix shift assuming +10-15% uninsured walk-ins, build a sliding-fee-scale capacity plan, document indigent-care subsidy gaps for county advocacy, and engage the CSAC ask through CPCA regional coalition channels. Counties without the state backfill will absorb the cost by cutting other public-health programs — meaning FQHCs lose contracts (CalAIM, BHCIP grants) AND gain uninsured volume simultaneously. Both edges of the squeeze hit at once.
CalMatters reports (May 2026) that California's community-based mobile crisis services — currently a statewide benefit — could become an optional Medi-Cal benefit after the Dec 2026 enhanced federal funding expires. Currently $65M (FY25-26) / $95.5M (FY26-27) of MCO Tax revenue supports community-based mobile crisis + transitional rent + BH provider rate increases. Strategic implication for FQHCs with BH integration (especially co-responder partnerships): (1) co-responder models with city/county dispatch may lose state-mandated reimbursement after Dec 2026; (2) mobile crisis FTEs (LCSWs, AMFTs, peer specialists) may shift from sustainable Medi-Cal billing to grant-dependent funding; (3) CalAIM ECM transitions that rely on mobile crisis as a bridge may need to design alternatives by Q4 2026; (4) FQHCs with established mobile crisis programs (especially in LA, SF, Sacramento, San Diego, Bay Area) should track whether the May 14 Revise confirms, accelerates, or pulls back this shift. Pairs with Newsom $5.8B BHCIP cumulative announcement and Lodi Wellness Center closure as the BH funding-reshuffle cluster.
Sacramento County's FY2026-27 Recommended Budget transmittal earmarks $6.5M of an $11.8M Health Services budget allocation for a new Behavioral Health Urgent Care Center (BHUCC) under the Mays Consent Decree (court-ordered jail mental-health reform). Funded by Patient Care Revenue, not federal. Budget hearings scheduled June 4-6, 2026. Strategic implication for Sacramento-area FQHCs (WellSpace Health, Sacramento Native American Health Center, One Community Health, Elica Health Centers): (1) BHUCC creates downstream referral pipeline opportunities — co-locate or partner outreach should begin pre-opening; (2) potential workforce competition for BH staff (LCSWs, AMFTs, BH-MAs) — review FY26-27 comp bands now; (3) Mays Consent Decree referrals (court-mandated jail-to-community mental health continuum) are a defined patient population FQHCs can intercept with reentry-focused programs; (4) testimony window June 4-6 — submit comments aligning FQHC capacity with county BHUCC scope. Pairs with WellSpace integrated campus groundbreaking, Newsom $5.8B BHCIP cumulative announcement, and the Lodi Wellness Center closure as the Northern California BH capital reshuffle.
Sacramento County DHHS estimates 73,000 residents will lose Medi-Cal coverage in the next 12 months due to H.R. 1-driven eligibility changes (six-month redeterminations by Dec 31, 2026), the new $30/mo UIS premium starting July 2027, and the federal admin match cut from 50% to 25% (Oct 2026). Direct implication for Sacramento's 11 FQHCs (2,196 staff, 319K patients): a meaningful share of the 73K disenrolled will keep showing up for care, but as uninsured rather than Medi-Cal — increasing uncompensated care exposure. Most affected: WellSpace Health (largest BH+primary care footprint), Sacramento Native American Health Center, One Community Health (HIV-focused), Elica Health Centers, and The Effort. Strategic implications: (1) update FY26-27 charity care budget assumptions, (2) accelerate patient outreach for redetermination support, (3) negotiate MCP capitation rates that reflect rising churn, (4) consider Sliding Fee Scale rate adjustments. The May Revise (mid-May) is the next state-level signal for whether the county estimate will hold or worsen.
The Kaiser-NUHW mental health therapists strike, which began September 2025 and was the longest mental-health-worker strike in U.S. history (196 days), ended with a tentative agreement and ratification confirmed in late April 2026. ~2,400 NUHW therapists resumed work. Terms: defined-benefit pension restored, raises, but agreement 'does not establish full equity for behavioral health within the Kaiser system.' Strategic implication for CA FQHCs: (1) the Kaiser pension+raise package becomes the new BH compensation ceiling FQHCs are measured against — expect upward wage pressure for LCSWs, AMFTs, and BH directors, especially in Bay Area, LA, and Sacramento where Kaiser is dominant; (2) the AI-replacement narrative that fueled the strike (Kaiser deploying 'crisis support chatbots' alongside therapist cuts) is no longer publicly hot — but the underlying tension remains; (3) FQHC BH integration models that lean heavily on LCSW/AMFT staff should review FY26-27 comp bands, especially given SB 525 phase 2 ($22/hr July 1, 2026). Positive momentum: longest strike in history ended with workers winning meaningful ground — a counter-narrative to the H.R. 1/Section 504 funding-cut frame.
California Health Care Foundation released (April 29, 2026) a major analysis modeling state-level coverage alternatives for the up-to-2-million Californians projected to lose Medi-Cal coverage from H.R. 1 work mandates, 6-month redetermination cycles, and immigrant restrictions. CHCF models two illustrative state options at $3.1B–$4.6B/yr versus $6.7B/yr for full Medi-Cal-equivalent replacement. The analysis frames the policy debate Sacramento will run through 2027 and intersects directly with the May 14 May Revision: if the Newsom Revise tightens UIS or freezes safety-net programs, the $3.1B–$6.7B coverage gap moves from the modeling stage into legislative session priorities. Strategic implication for FQHC executives: 2M uninsured falls disproportionately on FQHCs as providers of last resort. Annual financial planning should now incorporate (1) elevated uncompensated-care projections, (2) sliding-scale fee schedule capacity reviews, (3) Medi-Cal redetermination case management staffing models, (4) advocacy alignment with CPCA/CCALAC behind whichever option the Legislature prioritizes. Pairs with the Durazo Medi-Cal restoration bill and SB 1422 already tracked.
California Health Care Foundation published (April 29, 2026) an Expert Perspective on California's Office of Health Care Affordability (OHCA) primary-care spending benchmark — 15% of total medical expenditure by 2034, with annual increases of 0.5–1 percentage point from 2025–2033. November 2025 saw a Sacramento convening of 63 plan/provider/agency leaders signaling that implementation is now in active design. KFF Health News covered the same story. Strategic implication for FQHC executives: the benchmark is material upside for FQHCs as primary-care providers — but only if the dollars flow through PPS / APM rather than narrow networks excluding FQHCs. Action items: (1) join CPCA primary-care benchmark working groups, (2) ensure FQHC inclusion language in any OHCA implementation guidance, (3) model PPS/APM revenue sensitivity to a 1pp shift in PMPM allocation. Pairs with the CA FQHC APM activation (Jan 2026) and UIS PPS elimination (July 2026) — three major FQHC reimbursement levers all moving simultaneously.