Loading...
Loading...
Regional dashboard covering 39 Federally Qualified Health Centers across 417 sites in the Bay Area region.
This strategic report is analysis compiled from public sources (HRSA UDS, CMS, WARN Act filings, news coverage, public Glassdoor reviews). Claims about workforce stability, financial positioning, or operational resilience are informational only and may not reflect current operations. For authoritative information, contact the organization directly.
The most important things to know about Bay Area right now. Tap a bullet to jump to the underlying section.
39
across 417 sites
21,375
avg 548 per FQHC
885
5 events tracked
3.3/5
31 of 39 rated
How this region compares against the statewide average across the metrics that matter most.
Resilience
67/100
Glassdoor
3.3/5
Open Jobs / FQHC
7
Coverage Vulnerability
37%
FQHCs grouped by exposure to layoffs, low resilience, and H.R. 1 funding impact. Combines resilience score, layoff history, coverage vulnerability, and funding-impact level.
San Francisco · Grade D (40/100)
San Jose · Grade D (43/100)
San Rafael · Grade D (46/100)
San Francisco · Grade D (48/100)
Cloverdale · Grade C (50/100)
Palo Alto · Grade C (50/100)
San Jose · Grade C (54/100)
Oakland · Grade C (55/100)
Fairfield · Grade C (55/100)
Moderate exposure
San Leandro · Grade C (61/100)
Moderate exposure
Oakland · Grade C (63/100)
Moderate exposure
Healdsburg · Grade B (65/100)
Moderate exposure
Oakland · Grade B (67/100)
Moderate exposure
Petaluma · Grade B (67/100)
Moderate exposure
San Mateo · Grade B (67/100)
Moderate exposure
Guerneville · Grade B (69/100)
Moderate exposure
San Rafael · Grade A (84/100)
San Francisco · Grade A (83/100)
East Palo Alto · Grade A (81/100)
Oakland · Grade A (80/100)
Oakland · Grade B (78/100)
Berkeley · Grade B (77/100)
San Francisco · Grade B (77/100)
Fremont · Grade B (75/100)
Average resilience score: 67/100. Distribution of grades across 39 FQHCs.
Search by name or city. Sort any column. Filter by resilience grade or H.R. 1 funding impact.
39 of 39 FQHCs
| Asian Health Services Oakland | Oakland | 265 | A | 3.3 | 4 |
| North East Medical Services San Francisco | San Francisco | 700 | A | 2.7 | 10 |
| Marin Community Clinics San Rafael | San Rafael | 170 | A | 2.9 | 6 |
| HealthRIGHT 360 San Francisco | San Francisco | 280 | A | 3.1 | 4 |
| Ravenswood Family Health Network East Palo Alto | East Palo Alto | 110 | A | 3.4 | 4 |
| West Oakland Health Council Oakland | Oakland | 100 | A | 2.7 | 3 |
| Mission Neighborhood Health CenterH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | 150 | B | 3.1 | 4 |
| La Clinica de La RazaH.R. 1 Oakland | Oakland | 475 | B | 3.4 | 5 |
| Native American Health Center Oakland | Oakland | 75 | B | 3.4 | 4 |
| LifeLong Medical Care Berkeley | Berkeley | 350 | B | 3.3 | 5 |
| San Francisco Community Health Center San Francisco | San Francisco | 85 | B | 3.2 | 3 |
| Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Hayward | Hayward | 300 | B | 3.4 | 10 |
| Contra Costa HealthH.R. 1 Martinez | Martinez | 4,500 | B | 3.7 | 11 |
| Gardner Health Services San Jose | San Jose | 220 | B | 3.6 | 4 |
| Ole Health Napa | Napa | 500 | B | 3.7 | 9 |
| Tri-City Health Center Fremont | Fremont | 150 | B | 2.8 | 3 |
| Axis Community Health Pleasanton | Pleasanton | 90 | B | 3.2 | 3 |
| Planned Parenthood Mar Monte San Jose | San Jose | 200 | B | 3.4 | 9 |
| Salud Para La GenteH.R. 1 Watsonville | Watsonville | 140 | B | 3.7 | 3 |
| West County Health Centers Guerneville | Guerneville | 100 | B | — | 6 |
| Children's Hospital & Research Center at Oakland Oakland | Oakland | — | B | 3.7 | 5 |
| Petaluma Health Center Petaluma | Petaluma | 400 | B | 3.9 | 8 |
| San Mateo Medical Center San Mateo | San Mateo | 1,000 | B | 3.5 | 14 |
| Bay Area Community Health (BACH) Union City | Union City | 558 | B | 3.1 | 4 |
| Alliance Medical Center Healdsburg | Healdsburg | 138 | B | — | 9 |
| Brighter Beginnings Oakland | Oakland | — | C | 3.8 | 4 |
| Santa Clara Valley HealthH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 5,000 | C | 3.7 | 16 |
| The Davis Street Community Center San Leandro | San Leandro | — | C | 2.6 | 6 |
| Mission Area Health AssociatesH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | — | C | 3.1 | 8 |
| Alameda Health SystemH.R. 1 Oakland | Oakland | 4,500 | C | 3.4 | 10 |
| Solano County Health & Social Services Department Fairfield | Fairfield | — | C | 3.3 | 5 |
| Asian Americans for Community Involvement (AACI)H.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 200 | C | 3.1 | 9 |
| Indian Health Center of Santa Clara ValleyH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 330 | C | — | 11 |
| Alexander Valley Healthcare (formerly Coppertower)H.R. 1 Cloverdale | Cloverdale | 51,200 | C | — | 5 |
| Peninsula Healthcare ConnectionH.R. 1 Palo Alto | Palo Alto | 60 | C | — | 15 |
| Equity HealthH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | 5,080 | D | — | 15 |
| Ritter CenterH.R. 1 San Rafael | San Rafael | 70 | D | — | 4 |
| School Health Clinics of Santa Clara CountyH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 58 | D | — | 17 |
| Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness CenterH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | — | D | 3.2 | 8 |
291 open jobs across 39 FQHCs. 885 workers affected by layoffs.
San Jose · Feb 11, 2026
Board of Supervisors approved mid-year budget action to offset federal funding cuts. $183M in healthcare budget reductions including deletion of 365 FTE positions. County projects $470M deficit for upcoming fiscal year even after Measure A passage.
San Rafael · Jan 10, 2026 · 0.07% of workforce
Operational restructuring across Northern California facilities. Includes 42 nurses from San Rafael/Petaluma clinics, 64 IT/business roles, and 52 educational program positions.
Oakland · Jan 6, 2026 · 5.3% of workforce
Medicaid/Medi-Cal funding cuts under H.R. 1 projected to cost $30M in year one and $100M by 2027. AHS serves predominantly low-income and uninsured patients, with 70%+ revenue from Medi-Cal.
San Jose · Oct 1, 2025
Complete facility closure. WARN Act filing indicates permanent closure of the Indian Health Center, which served Native American and Alaska Native communities in Santa Clara County. The center was an FQHC providing primary care, dental, behavioral health, and traditional healing services.
Fremont · Apr 1, 2025 · 7.5% of workforce
Reduction in federal community health center grants and CalAIM Enhanced Care Management funding uncertainties.
Union organizing, NLRB cases, contract negotiations, strikes, and ballot measures touching FQHCs in this region. Statewide CA cases included.
AB 1113 pursues the same 90% mission-spend ratio through the legislature rather than the ballot box. FQHCs must report total revenues by June 30, 2026, using IRS Form 990 Line 25 (Column B, Part IX) as the basis. DHCS must adopt implementation methodology by January 1, 2027. Includes annual registration fees to fund enforcement. This is a two-pronged SEIU-UHW strategy: AB 1113 through the legislature + the ballot measure as backup/pressure. Opposition campaign active at stopab1113.com.
Next: Jun 30 — FQHCs must report total revenues to department
CA LegislatureAsian Health Services' General Unit and Specialty Mental Health Unit CBAs with SEIU Local 1021 both expire June 30, 2026. This creates a dangerous compounded crisis: AHS faces a projected August 2026 cash runout (tracked in `ahs-seiu-1021-layoff-crisis`), and its $91.7M deficit makes it nearly impossible to offer meaningful wage increases. SEIU 1021 won an historic 21% average raise in the 2023 contract — management cannot credibly repeat that. If AHS undergoes merger or acquisition, SEIU 1021 successor clause rights become the central legal issue. Bargaining should begin by April–May 2026 if it has not already.
Next: Jun 30 — Contract expiration — if no new agreement, workers may be on expired contract while FQHC faces August cash runout
SEIU 1021SEIU-UHW leads a ballot drive for a one-time 5% wealth tax on California's ~200 billionaires (~$2T combined wealth), projected to generate $100B over 5 years. 90% would fund healthcare programs. If passed, this could be the largest state-level healthcare funding mechanism in US history and would directly offset H.R. 1 Medicaid cuts. This is a rare case where SEIU and FQHCs have aligned interests — more healthcare funding benefits both workers and employers.
Next: Apr 30 — Signature collection deadline (Regan target)
SEIU-UHWHealthRIGHT 360's first CBA (ratified with 98% approval after 850+ workers organized in 2023) covers 2024-2026 and is nearing expiration. Renegotiations should be imminent or underway. Workers are represented by SEIU Locals 1021, 721, and 221. HealthRIGHT 360 is a major behavioral health and substance use treatment provider. The renegotiation will be a bellwether for FQHC labor relations — it was one of the largest single-organization FQHC organizing wins in California.
Next: Dec 31 — CBA expires — renegotiation expected
SEIU 1021SEIU-UHW submitted signatures April 3 for Initiative #25-0008 requiring FQHCs to spend 90% of revenue on 'mission-related expenses.' A Berkeley Research Group study commissioned by Protect Patients CA finds this would redirect $1.7B from community health centers and push two-thirds into operating deficits. The 90% threshold would exclude spending on nurse/physician managers, translation services, enrollment navigators, transportation, community outreach, and new clinic construction. CMA, CPCA, CCALAC, AltaMed, and FHCSD lead the opposition.
Next: Nov 3 — Election Day — measure on the Nov 3, 2026 statewide ballot (formal certification by June 25)
BallotpediaCompanion measure to #25-0008 capping healthcare executive compensation at $450,000 with a 3.5% annual escalator. It QUALIFIED for the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot (~May 12-13, 2026) — now styled the 'Health Care Executive Compensation Act of 2026' — after SEIU-UHW submitted 1M+ signatures. As drafted it covers private hospitals, physician groups, and special-district hospitals and EXCLUDES physician groups with fewer than 25 employees and county hospitals — so it is the pressure/companion measure to the FQHC-scoped 90% initiative (#25-0008), not itself FQHC-specific. Paired with #25-0008 it nonetheless shapes the leadership-pay and resource-allocation environment FQHCs operate in.
Next: Nov 3 — On the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot (Secretary of State slate certification expected ~June 25, 2026)
Ballotpedia+ 4 more cases tracked
Coalition actions, ballot initiatives, lawsuits, and legislation actively defending FQHC funding and patients in this region.
The Secretary of State announced June 17 that SEIU-UHW's one-time 5% wealth tax on California billionaires QUALIFIED for the November 3, 2026 ballot (it submitted 1.55M signatures April 27 against an 874,641 threshold). The measure earmarks ~90% of revenue for state healthcare programs including Medi-Cal — a direct counter-narrative to H.R. 1 cuts. On June 18, SEIU-UHW offered Gov. Newsom a deal to abandon the 5% measure if he backed a smaller 2% legislative levy on billionaires; Newsom REJECTED those terms ("strongly opposed to a California-only wealth tax"). Per CalMatters, he is both racing to broker a last-minute withdrawal deal before the June 25 deadline AND backing an opposition coalition (including some left-leaning groups) to defeat the measure if it reaches the ballot. It is distinct from (but coordinated with) the SEIU-UHW 90% patient-care-spend (#25-0008) and exec-pay-cap (#25-0009) measures and CHA's counter-measure (#25-0021). Strategic implication for FQHCs: if it survives to the ballot and passes, it would create a dedicated Medi-Cal revenue stream — but it now faces well-funded opposition led by the Governor.
Follow-up: Jun 25, 2026
CalMattersCPCA Advocates — the political arm of the California Primary Care Association — is listed among Xavier Becerra's organizational endorsers (confirmed on his campaign endorsements page, alongside the California Medical Association, the California Academy of Family Physicians, LA County Medical Association, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, UAPD, the Union of Health Care Professionals, and UNAC). Becerra — former U.S. HHS Secretary and California Attorney General — topped the June 2 primary (~27%) and advances to the November 3, 2026 general election. He is the most Medicaid-literate plausible governor in state history: he ran HHS during ACA expansion and has centered Medi-Cal coverage continuity, Prop 35, and MCO-tax durability in his platform. The timing caveat matters for FQHCs: even if elected, Becerra is not sworn in until January 2027 — after the December 31, 2026 'triple cliff' — so an endorsement is a long-game bet on the post-cliff recovery environment, not a rescue for the cliff itself. No specific endorsement date is published; recorded here as confirmed in June 2026.
Follow-up: Nov 3, 2026
Becerra for Governor 2026 (campaign endorsements page)The California Hospital Association's counter-initiative — #25-0021, 'Restricts Political Spending by Health Care Unions' — became eligible for the November 3, 2026 ballot on June 5, 2026. It requires healthcare unions with 50,000+ members (i.e., SEIU-UHW) to annually disclose how member dues fund political activity and to obtain majority member approval for such spending. It is a direct counterweight to SEIU-UHW's two qualified measures: the 90% clinic-spending mandate (#25-0008 / Measure 1986, the FQHC-direct threat) and the $450K executive-pay cap (#25-0009 / Measure 1985). Three healthcare measures now sit on the November ballot, and the June 25, 2026 withdrawal deadline opens a classic mutual-disarmament window — a negotiated deal between SEIU-UHW and the hospital industry could pull one or more measures (including the FQHC-threatening #25-0008) before voters ever decide. For FQHC leaders, this means the most consequential clinic-finance measure in California history could be settled in a backroom by June 25, not at the ballot box in November.
Follow-up: Jun 25, 2026
California Secretary of StateThe Community Health Center Fund — ~70% of federal Section 330 grant dollars (~$4.6B/yr), the financial foundation beneath every FQHC's PPS billing — expires December 31, 2026, the same day as CalAIM and the Medi-Cal MCO tax. NHSC mandatory funding was extended only through Jan 30, 2026 and now runs on a continuing resolution (~$350M/yr). NACHC's ask: a multi-year CHCF extension plus $950M/yr in mandatory NHSC funding for two years. 288 House members and 57 Senators have signed Dear Colleague letters, but no standalone reauthorization bill has been introduced — the likely vehicle is a year-end appropriations or reconciliation package. For FQHCs nationally this is the single highest-stakes funding-cliff advocacy of 2026.
Follow-up: Sep 30, 2026
NACHCCalifornia's Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) opened the inaugural application cycle of the Medi-Cal Behavioral Health Recruitment & Retention Program (MBH-RRP) on June 1, 2026 — a BH-CONNECT / Proposition 1-funded workforce program for which FQHCs, Community Mental Health Centers, RHCs, and any setting with 40%+ Medicaid/uninsured patients are explicitly eligible. Awards include recruitment bonuses up to $20,000/hire, retention bonuses up to $4,000, pre-licensure/pre-certification supervision support up to $35,000/year, student support up to $50,000/individual, and licensure/certification fees up to $1,500 (with 2-4 year service obligations scaled to award size). Applications close July 15, 2026 at 3:00 PM. For FQHCs squeezed by H.R. 1 cuts and the July 1 UIS-PPS hit, this is a direct, time-limited behavioral-health staffing subsidy open right now — the state-side complement to the federal H.R. 8629 workforce bill.
Follow-up: Jul 15, 2026
California HCAIAB 1460 would bar drug manufacturers from restricting 340B contract-pharmacy arrangements for California covered entities — closing a gap NACHC's tracker flags (CA is one of ~13 states without this shield). It passed the Assembly (44-6) and is now in the Senate, where it was amended to add annual 340B-compliance reporting and audit requirements — a compromise pairing FQHC/hospital access protection with the transparency demands pharma and others have pushed. For California's 220+ FQHCs, passage would protect a core 340B revenue stream, but the new reporting requirement is operationally meaningful. Opposition has surfaced — the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) issued a public letter urging the California Senate to reject AB 1460. Pairs with the failed Minnesota 340B bill (a cautionary precedent) and the Eli Lilly / Novo claims-data mandates.
Follow-up: Jun 24, 2026
340B ReportAI implementation news and case studies that mention this region or its FQHCs.
Future Communities Institute, Akido Labs, Five Keys, and ReImagine Freedom launched the Bay Area's first AI-powered street medicine program in January 2026. ScopeAI guides community health workers through comprehensive patient visits on tablets — listening to encounters, suggesting follow-up questions, generating preliminary diagnoses (92% accurate in top 3), and producing clinical reports for remote physician review. In LA/Kern counties, the model already serves 6,000 unhoused patients with 70% six-month retention and 40% ED visit reduction. Funded entirely through Medi-Cal's CalAIM Enhanced Care Management — no grants. Providers see ~350 patients per physician (vs. 200 previously). Patients needing MAT receive treatment within 4 hours. Critics raise concerns about experimenting on vulnerable populations and algorithmic bias.
KTVU / CalMatters · Jan 202674 intelligence items relevant to this region.
Asian Health Services (Oakland/San Leandro; ~50,000 patients across 15 Alameda County sites) will launch California's first community-health-center-based dental residency in July 2026 — a 12-month program (CODA accreditation pending after a September 2025 site visit) at its Oakland Chinatown and San Leandro clinics, and the first dental residency at a California health center not affiliated with a dental or academic school. The structural significance is the workforce-pipeline logic: rather than competing with private practice for finished dental graduates, AHS will train new dentists inside the FQHC setting from day one — building familiarity with sliding-fee dentistry, Denti-Cal billing, and a high-need bilingual patient panel before they ever consider a private offer. It is a replicable model for the other CA FQHCs that operate Teaching Health Centers, and a rare positive workforce-development counterweight in a year dominated by funding cliffs and hiring freezes. It also lands as ~2M immigrants are set to lose full Medi-Cal dental July 1, 2026 — exactly when the safety-net dental workforce needs to deepen, not thin.
Contra Costa County's Measure B — a 0.625-cent general sales tax projected to raise ~$150 million a year for five years, placed on the June 2 ballot explicitly to 'address deep cuts in federal funding' — failed decisively. The June 5 count shows ~42.1% yes to ~57.9% no, down by more than 36,500 votes (it needed a simple majority). County staff had projected more than $300 million in health-system losses over five years, and the 'Safe & Healthy Contra Costa' campaign warned ~93,000 residents could lose coverage by 2029 and that H.R. 1 could cut ~$1.5 billion in federal contributions to Contra Costa Health over five years. Contra Costa Health runs the county hospital, its clinics, and Contra Costa Health Plan (~270,000 members) — so the 'no' vote means there is no local backstop for the July 1 UIS-PPS cut and the H.R. 1 Medicaid losses in a major Bay Area county. For independent Contra Costa FQHCs (LifeLong Medical Care, La Clínica de la Raza, Brighter Beginnings), the failure removes a potential referral-and-stability cushion and signals harder county-side competition for shrinking dollars. The bigger pattern: California's 'tax ourselves to backfill federal Medicaid cuts' model is now 2 wins (Santa Clara Measure A, ~$330M/yr, Nov 2025; LA's Measure ER passed June 10, ~$1B/yr) and 1 loss (Contra Costa B failed) — voters will fund a county-anchored health system but rejected Contra Costa's general-fund version.
As the immigration crackdown continues, La Clínica de la Raza launched a county-wide Medi-Cal enrollment campaign — reported by bilingual outlet El Tímpano — to keep currently-eligible immigrant patients covered before a missed 90-day paperwork window locks them out permanently. Community health workers describe a dual threat: the Jan-2026 enrollment freeze AND a chilling effect in which eligible patients avoid both enrolling and visiting clinics for fear coverage could be used against them in immigration proceedings (a misreading of public-charge rules, but a real deterrent). For FQHCs with large Spanish-speaking panels — La Clínica, AltaMed, Asian Health Services, LifeLong — the result is lost visit volume and revenue on top of the mechanical coverage cuts.
Monterey County's Alisal Health Center in Salinas reopens May 30, 2026, after a planned 5-month closure (Dec 29, 2025 – May 30, 2026) for remodel. Patients were diverted to alternate clinic locations during the closure. Salinas is a heavily Latino, farmworker community — Salud Para La Gente, also serving the area, may have absorbed some displaced patients during the closure. Reopening provides relief but the workforce pattern (5-month closures, county-clinic operational instability) is a competitive opening for FQHC market-share expansion in agricultural Central Coast.
Alameda County's recommended FY2026-27 budget, presented to supervisors May 28, closes a $91.4 million spending gap without layoffs or major service cuts — buoyed in part by the Measure W sales tax. Roughly 30% of county spending is healthcare and ~60% of county revenue is state/federal, so the 'no layoffs' outcome is a near-term stabilizer for Alameda Health System as the East Bay safety-net backstop, supporting referral capacity for FQHCs like LifeLong Medical Care, La Clínica de la Raza, and Asian Health Services. Hearings are set for June 22-23 and 25. Caveat: it is a one-year balance, not a structural fix — the underlying Medicaid exposure remains.
KVPR / Public Health Watch published the first sector-wide enrollment numbers since California's UIS (Undocumented Income-Sensitive) freeze took effect: 86,000+ immigrants without legal status either lost or were denied Medi-Cal in January-February 2026, exiting at 6x the rate of other enrollees. Modeling projects ~1.3M Californians will lose full-scope Medi-Cal coverage over the next 4 years if the freeze stays in place. This pairs with the Kheir Clinic patient-coverage story (60-100 enrollment-help requests per day) already tracked — Kheir was the single-clinic anecdote; this is the statewide denominator. Strategic implication: FQHCs are absorbing the coverage hit. Largest exposure: AltaMed, FHCSD, La Clinica de la Raza, Clinica Sierra Vista, United Health Centers, Family Healthcare Network, Clinicas del Camino Real. This is the data FQHC CFOs need for board presentations explaining 2026 sliding-fee-scale demand surges and self-pay collections decline.
Against a Bay Area backdrop of San Francisco DPH cuts and Santa Clara's deficit, San Mateo County's proposed ~$5.2 billion FY2026-27 budget (released ~May 25) goes the other way: it adds 15 health-care-access positions specifically to help an estimated 59,000 Medi-Cal and 33,000 CalFresh recipients navigate the coming eligibility and redetermination churn. It is a rare net-positive county staffing signal and a template worth citing in advocacy — counties can choose to staff up eligibility/navigation support rather than cut it, directly protecting FQHC billing revenue by keeping patients enrolled. For Peninsula FQHCs (Ravenswood Family Health, North East Medical Services), more county navigators mean fewer coverage-loss-driven no-pay visits.
California's May Revision layers an additional $231M (FY26-27), rising to $322M (FY27-28), in losses onto Santa Clara Valley Medical Center — the state's 2nd-largest public hospital system — on top of federal H.R. 1 cuts. This is distinct from the already-tracked $787M Santa Clara County structural deficit; it is specifically the state-budget 'double-blow' to the public hospital system. Strategic implication for Bay Area FQHCs: SCVMC is the referral, specialty, and ED backstop that South Bay FQHCs depend on — destabilizing it pushes uncompensated demand and unmet specialty referrals back onto safety-net primary care. FQHCs should model longer specialty wait times and stronger ED-diversion/ECM positioning as the county system contracts.