Loading...
Loading...
Regional dashboard covering 40 Federally Qualified Health Centers across 420 sites in the Bay Area region.
This strategic report is analysis compiled from public sources (HRSA UDS, CMS, WARN Act filings, news coverage, public Glassdoor reviews). Claims about workforce stability, financial positioning, or operational resilience are informational only and may not reflect current operations. For authoritative information, contact the organization directly.
The most important things to know about Bay Area right now. Tap a bullet to jump to the underlying section.
40
across 420 sites
21,450
avg 536 per FQHC
885
5 events tracked
3.3/5
31 of 40 rated
How this region compares against the statewide average across the metrics that matter most.
Resilience
67/100
Glassdoor
3.3/5
Open Jobs / FQHC
7
Coverage Vulnerability
36%
FQHCs grouped by exposure to layoffs, low resilience, and H.R. 1 funding impact. Combines resilience score, layoff history, coverage vulnerability, and funding-impact level.
San Francisco · Grade D (49/100)
San Jose · Grade D (49/100)
Palo Alto · Grade C (50/100)
San Jose · Grade C (50/100)
San Jose · Grade C (50/100)
San Francisco · Grade C (52/100)
San Francisco · Grade C (52/100)
San Rafael · Grade C (53/100)
San Leandro · Grade C (54/100)
Moderate exposure
Fairfield · Grade C (57/100)
Moderate exposure
Oakland · Grade C (58/100)
Moderate exposure
Healdsburg · Grade C (59/100)
Moderate exposure
Guerneville · Grade C (60/100)
Moderate exposure
Oakland · Grade C (63/100)
Moderate exposure
Petaluma · Grade B (65/100)
Moderate exposure
San Mateo · Grade B (68/100)
Moderate exposure
Berkeley · Grade A (86/100)
San Francisco · Grade A (83/100)
East Palo Alto · Grade A (81/100)
Oakland · Grade B (78/100)
San Francisco · Grade B (77/100)
San Rafael · Grade B (77/100)
Pleasanton · Grade B (75/100)
Fremont · Grade B (75/100)
Average resilience score: 67/100. Distribution of grades across 40 FQHCs.
Search by name or city. Sort any column. Filter by resilience grade or H.R. 1 funding impact.
40 of 40 FQHCs
| LifeLong Medical Care Berkeley | Berkeley | 350 | A | 3.3 | 5 |
| Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Hayward | Hayward | 300 | A | 3.4 | 10 |
| HealthRIGHT 360 San Francisco | San Francisco | 280 | A | 3.1 | 4 |
| Ravenswood Family Health Network East Palo Alto | East Palo Alto | 110 | A | 3.4 | 4 |
| Gardner Health Services San Jose | San Jose | 220 | A | 3.6 | 4 |
| Asian Health Services Oakland | Oakland | 265 | B | 3.3 | 4 |
| Native American Health Center Oakland | Oakland | 75 | B | 3.4 | 4 |
| San Francisco Community Health Center San Francisco | San Francisco | 85 | B | 3.2 | 3 |
| Marin Community Clinics San Rafael | San Rafael | 170 | B | 2.9 | 6 |
| Axis Community Health Pleasanton | Pleasanton | 90 | B | 3.2 | 3 |
| Tri-City Health Center Fremont | Fremont | 150 | B | 2.8 | 3 |
| West Oakland Health Council Oakland | Oakland | 100 | B | 2.7 | 3 |
| Ole Health Napa | Napa | 500 | B | 3.7 | 9 |
| La Clinica de La RazaH.R. 1 Oakland | Oakland | 475 | B | 3.4 | 5 |
| North East Medical Services San Francisco | San Francisco | 700 | B | 2.7 | 10 |
| Planned Parenthood Mar Monte San Jose | San Jose | 200 | B | 3.4 | 9 |
| Sausal Creek Health Center Oakland | Oakland | 75 | B | — | 2 |
| Bay Area Community Health (BACH) Union City | Union City | 558 | B | 3.1 | 4 |
| Mission Neighborhood Health CenterH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | 150 | B | 3.1 | 4 |
| Contra Costa HealthH.R. 1 Martinez | Martinez | 4,500 | B | 3.7 | 11 |
| Santa Clara Valley HealthH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 5,000 | B | 3.7 | 16 |
| San Mateo Medical Center San Mateo | San Mateo | 1,000 | B | 3.5 | 14 |
| Salud Para La GenteH.R. 1 Watsonville | Watsonville | 140 | B | 3.7 | 3 |
| Petaluma Health Center Petaluma | Petaluma | 400 | B | 3.9 | 8 |
| Alameda Health SystemH.R. 1 Oakland | Oakland | 4,500 | C | 3.4 | 10 |
| Brighter Beginnings Oakland | Oakland | — | C | 3.8 | 4 |
| West County Health Centers Guerneville | Guerneville | 100 | C | — | 6 |
| Alliance Medical Center Healdsburg | Healdsburg | 138 | C | — | 9 |
| Children's Hospital & Research Center at Oakland Oakland | Oakland | — | C | 3.7 | 5 |
| Alexander Valley Healthcare (formerly Coppertower)H.R. 1 Cloverdale | Cloverdale | 51,200 | C | — | 5 |
| Solano County Health & Social Services Department Fairfield | Fairfield | — | C | 3.3 | 5 |
| The Davis Street Community Center San Leandro | San Leandro | — | C | 2.6 | 6 |
| Ritter CenterH.R. 1 San Rafael | San Rafael | 70 | C | — | 4 |
| Equity HealthH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | 5,080 | C | — | 15 |
| Mission Area Health AssociatesH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | — | C | 3.1 | 8 |
| Peninsula Healthcare ConnectionH.R. 1 Palo Alto | Palo Alto | 60 | C | — | 15 |
| School Health Clinics of Santa Clara CountyH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 58 | C | — | 17 |
| Asian Americans for Community Involvement (AACI)H.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 200 | C | 3.1 | 9 |
| Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness CenterH.R. 1 San Francisco | San Francisco | — | D | 3.2 | 8 |
| Indian Health Center of Santa Clara ValleyH.R. 1 San Jose | San Jose | 330 | D | — | 11 |
293 open jobs across 40 FQHCs. 885 workers affected by layoffs.
San Jose · Feb 11, 2026
Board of Supervisors approved mid-year budget action to offset federal funding cuts. $183M in healthcare budget reductions including deletion of 365 FTE positions. County projects $470M deficit for upcoming fiscal year even after Measure A passage.
San Rafael · Jan 10, 2026 · 0.07% of workforce
Operational restructuring across Northern California facilities. Includes 42 nurses from San Rafael/Petaluma clinics, 64 IT/business roles, and 52 educational program positions.
Oakland · Jan 6, 2026 · 5.3% of workforce
Medicaid/Medi-Cal funding cuts under H.R. 1 projected to cost $30M in year one and $100M by 2027. AHS serves predominantly low-income and uninsured patients, with 70%+ revenue from Medi-Cal.
San Jose · Oct 1, 2025
Complete facility closure. WARN Act filing indicates permanent closure of the Indian Health Center, which served Native American and Alaska Native communities in Santa Clara County. The center was an FQHC providing primary care, dental, behavioral health, and traditional healing services.
Fremont · Apr 1, 2025 · 7.5% of workforce
Reduction in federal community health center grants and CalAIM Enhanced Care Management funding uncertainties.
Union organizing, NLRB cases, contract negotiations, strikes, and ballot measures touching FQHCs in this region. Statewide CA cases included.
2,400 Kaiser mental health therapists (NUHW) struck March 18, 2026 across Bay Area, Central Valley, and Sacramento. Key issues: AI replacement fears, chronic understaffing, and Kaiser's $200M DMHC settlement. Kaiser's 21.5% raise from the Jan-Feb nursing strike sets a wage benchmark FQHCs cannot match, potentially widening the compensation gap. However, the AI replacement narrative could push BH professionals toward FQHCs where clinician autonomy is higher.
Next: Jun 15 — Strike enters 9th month — NUHW staged FIRST act of civil disobedience April 30 (Session 32, day after Newsom-requested mediation). Kaiser presented no new proposals. Strategic escalation, political pressure intensifying. NUHW expanded organizing wins (1,300 new members / 9 facilities past 12 months including Imperial Beach Community Clinic FQHC) gives leverage. Newsom-requested mediation acceptance remains the swing variable. Watch for additional civil disobedience actions and any Kaiser counter-proposal in May/June.
NUHWSEIU-UHW submitted signatures April 3 for Initiative #25-0008 requiring FQHCs to spend 90% of revenue on 'mission-related expenses.' A Berkeley Research Group study commissioned by Protect Patients CA finds this would redirect $1.7B from community health centers and push two-thirds into operating deficits. The 90% threshold would exclude spending on nurse/physician managers, translation services, enrollment navigators, transportation, community outreach, and new clinic construction. CMA, CPCA, CCALAC, AltaMed, and FHCSD lead the opposition.
Next: Jun 25 — County signature verification deadline — Secretary of State expected to announce qualification by early summer 2026
BallotpediaCompanion measure to #25-0008 capping healthcare executive compensation at $450,000 with a 3.5% annual escalator. Submitted alongside the 90% spending mandate. Together, the two measures would fundamentally restructure how FQHCs allocate resources and compensate leadership.
Next: Jun 25 — County signature verification deadline — Secretary of State expected to announce qualification by early summer 2026
BallotpediaAB 1113 pursues the same 90% mission-spend ratio through the legislature rather than the ballot box. FQHCs must report total revenues by June 30, 2026, using IRS Form 990 Line 25 (Column B, Part IX) as the basis. DHCS must adopt implementation methodology by January 1, 2027. Includes annual registration fees to fund enforcement. This is a two-pronged SEIU-UHW strategy: AB 1113 through the legislature + the ballot measure as backup/pressure. Opposition campaign active at stopab1113.com.
Next: Jun 30 — FQHCs must report total revenues to department
CA LegislatureAsian Health Services' General Unit and Specialty Mental Health Unit CBAs with SEIU Local 1021 both expire June 30, 2026. This creates a dangerous compounded crisis: AHS faces a projected August 2026 cash runout (tracked in `ahs-seiu-1021-layoff-crisis`), and its $91.7M deficit makes it nearly impossible to offer meaningful wage increases. SEIU 1021 won an historic 21% average raise in the 2023 contract — management cannot credibly repeat that. If AHS undergoes merger or acquisition, SEIU 1021 successor clause rights become the central legal issue. Bargaining should begin by April–May 2026 if it has not already.
Next: Jun 30 — Contract expiration — if no new agreement, workers may be on expired contract while FQHC faces August cash runout
SEIU 1021SEIU-UHW leads a ballot drive for a one-time 5% wealth tax on California's ~200 billionaires (~$2T combined wealth), projected to generate $100B over 5 years. 90% would fund healthcare programs. If passed, this could be the largest state-level healthcare funding mechanism in US history and would directly offset H.R. 1 Medicaid cuts. This is a rare case where SEIU and FQHCs have aligned interests — more healthcare funding benefits both workers and employers.
Next: Apr 30 — Signature collection deadline (Regan target)
SEIU-UHW+ 4 more cases tracked
Coalition actions, ballot initiatives, lawsuits, and legislation actively defending FQHC funding and patients in this region.
The Health4All coalition (CPEHN, California Academy of Family Physicians, CRLAF, immigrant rights organizations) is mobilizing to block Governor Newsom's expected May 14 May Revision proposal to cut $1.1B in additional Medi-Cal funding targeting full-scope coverage for ~200,000 immigrant DV/trafficking survivors and to extend work requirements to state-only programs. Compounds the already-tracked UIS PPS elimination (July 1, 2026), $30/month undocumented adult premium (July 1, 2027), and dental benefits removal. Strategic implication: testimony window through approximately June 15 budget conference committee. CPCA-aligned FQHC executives should brief boards on multi-cliff revenue exposure before signing FY26-27 budgets.
Follow-up: Jun 15, 2026
CPEHNNACHC and Advocates for Community Health (ACH) — historically split on 340B reform direction — publicly set aside their differences in May 2026 for a joint Congressional ask to extend mandatory CHC funding past the January 30, 2026 expiration. Notable because the two organizations disagreed publicly in March 2026 on a 340B compromise bill. Setting differences aside signals existential urgency around the funding cliff. Strategic implication: a unified NACHC + ACH front strengthens FY27 appropriations advocacy at a critical moment. FQHC executives should align CPCA + state PCA messaging with the NACHC+ACH unified ask rather than running parallel independent tracks.
Follow-up: Sep 30, 2026
340B ReportNACHC announced its second 2026 in-district mobilization window: May 24 – June 1, 2026, targeting Members of Congress in their home districts to preserve health center mandatory funding ahead of the December 2026 expiration cliff. Builds on the April in-district window, with bipartisan reconciliation negotiators as the priority audience. NACHC frames the ask around its $7B Senate Finance testimony figure (7.6M patients, 1-in-5 closure scenario). Strategic implication: FQHC CEOs and government affairs leads should plan in-district visits for the May 24 - June 1 window, coordinate messaging with CPCA and CCALAC, and leverage local newspaper editorial boards in this period.
Follow-up: Jun 1, 2026
NACHCCalifornia Assembly Democrats released their 2026-27 budget road map around May 7, 2026 (one week before Newsom's May Revise on May 14), declaring: 'In 2026 we will draw a line in the sand, defending the safety net programs such as in-home care, healthcare and dental care, and food aid.' Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel are signaling Assembly resistance to UIS Medi-Cal cuts, $1B Medi-Cal Dental cut, enrollment freeze, and IHSS reductions. Paired with the Senate's mid-April equivalent proposal, this creates a bicameral counter-position against the Governor's January budget and forecasted May Revise. FQHC implications: formal legislative resistance to enrollment freeze, $30 UIS premium, dental cuts — all directly impact FQHC revenue cycles. June 15 budget adoption deadline.
Follow-up: May 14, 2026
California Assembly Budget CommitteeBuilding on the ~1M signatures filed April 27, the CalChamber-led 'Affordable California' coalition formally announced (May 6, 2026) that 100+ organizations — including business groups, taxpayer associations, and California Hospital Association — have joined the campaign. Marks the shift from signature-collection phase to coalition-mobilization phase ahead of the June 25 signature verification deadline. Direct counter to SEIU-UHW's twin pressure (90% Mission Spend ballot + Healthcare Executive Compensation Act + AB 1113). FQHC governance teams should: (1) review the public coalition lineup — many CalChamber-aligned orgs are also FQHC business partners; (2) align CCALAC/CPCA opposition messaging with the broader 'cost-impact' frame already running in CalChamber comms; (3) pre-position November 2026 voter education materials for both competing measures (likely to split voter attention).
Follow-up: Jun 25, 2026
CalChamberA coalition of health consumer advocates released 'Medi-Cal 2030: Person-Centered, Accountable, Sustainable' principles on May 5, 2026 — explicitly framed to guide policymakers in the May Revise (May 14) and June 15 budget adoption. Coalition members include Health Access California, National Health Law Program (NHeLP), Western Center on Law & Poverty, plus health consumer organizations representing communities of color, children, and older adults. Principles eliminate exclusions, remove discriminatory barriers, and guarantee comprehensive care across the lifespan with immigration status never as a barrier. Released 9 days before the May Revise and 41 days before budget adoption. Strategic pairing: while the CHCF-led Future of Medi-Cal Commission develops a January 2027 10-year roadmap, this advocacy coalition pushes near-term budget protection. FQHC executives should reference these principles in board materials and CPCA testimony — enrollment freeze, UIS dental, $30 premium are all targeted.
Follow-up: May 15, 2026
National Health Law ProgramAI implementation news and case studies that mention this region or its FQHCs.
Future Communities Institute, Akido Labs, Five Keys, and ReImagine Freedom launched the Bay Area's first AI-powered street medicine program in January 2026. ScopeAI guides community health workers through comprehensive patient visits on tablets — listening to encounters, suggesting follow-up questions, generating preliminary diagnoses (92% accurate in top 3), and producing clinical reports for remote physician review. In LA/Kern counties, the model already serves 6,000 unhoused patients with 70% six-month retention and 40% ED visit reduction. Funded entirely through Medi-Cal's CalAIM Enhanced Care Management — no grants. Providers see ~350 patients per physician (vs. 200 previously). Patients needing MAT receive treatment within 4 hours. Critics raise concerns about experimenting on vulnerable populations and algorithmic bias.
KTVU / CalMatters · Jan 202661 intelligence items relevant to this region.
Monterey County's Alisal Health Center in Salinas reopens May 30, 2026, after a planned 5-month closure (Dec 29, 2025 – May 30, 2026) for remodel. Patients were diverted to alternate clinic locations during the closure. Salinas is a heavily Latino, farmworker community — Salud Para La Gente, also serving the area, may have absorbed some displaced patients during the closure. Reopening provides relief but the workforce pattern (5-month closures, county-clinic operational instability) is a competitive opening for FQHC market-share expansion in agricultural Central Coast.
Fresno County is projected to face a $241M indigent care cost shift as 11,000–30,000 residents lose Medi-Cal coverage under H.R. 1 work mandates and 6-month redeterminations — landing on top of a ~$300M county budget hole and a hiring freeze. Public health, behavioral health, and social services are projected to absorb the largest hits. Critical context: Fresno, Tulare, Merced, Kern, and Madera counties exceed 50% Medi-Cal — making the Central Valley the single most FQHC-exposed region in California (more than LA, Bay Area, or San Diego). Strategic implication for Central Valley FQHCs (Clinica Sierra Vista, United Health Centers, Family Healthcare Network, Adventist Health, Camarena Health, Livingstone Community Health): (1) Model FY26-27 cash flow under 30K member loss, (2) Pre-build sliding-fee capacity expansion plans, (3) Coordinate advocacy with Fresno County supervisors on state offset funding requests (already public ask, March 2026), (4) Track CalAIM 1115 waiver renewal — Central Valley ECM contracts disproportionately exposed if waiver lapses Dec 31, 2026.
Sacramento County DHS Director Timothy Lutz quantified the H.R. 1 cost-shift to county safety nets: 73,000 county residents will lose Medi-Cal coverage in the next year, with 6,500 becoming the county's indigent care responsibility — 'tens of millions of dollars' that the county must absorb. This is the precise pipeline that will drive uninsured walk-ins to WellSpace Health, Elica Health Centers, One Community Health, CommuniCare Health Centers, and Health for All. Through CSAC and CWDA, California's 58 counties are asking the state for $1.9B in FY2026-27 + $4.5B in FY2027-28 to offset the cost-shift. This ask is timed to the May 14 May Revise budget release. Strategic implication for Sacramento-region FQHCs: model FY2026-27 patient mix shift assuming +10-15% uninsured walk-ins, build a sliding-fee-scale capacity plan, document indigent-care subsidy gaps for county advocacy, and engage the CSAC ask through CPCA regional coalition channels. Counties without the state backfill will absorb the cost by cutting other public-health programs — meaning FQHCs lose contracts (CalAIM, BHCIP grants) AND gain uninsured volume simultaneously. Both edges of the squeeze hit at once.
CalMatters reports (May 2026) that California's community-based mobile crisis services — currently a statewide benefit — could become an optional Medi-Cal benefit after the Dec 2026 enhanced federal funding expires. Currently $65M (FY25-26) / $95.5M (FY26-27) of MCO Tax revenue supports community-based mobile crisis + transitional rent + BH provider rate increases. Strategic implication for FQHCs with BH integration (especially co-responder partnerships): (1) co-responder models with city/county dispatch may lose state-mandated reimbursement after Dec 2026; (2) mobile crisis FTEs (LCSWs, AMFTs, peer specialists) may shift from sustainable Medi-Cal billing to grant-dependent funding; (3) CalAIM ECM transitions that rely on mobile crisis as a bridge may need to design alternatives by Q4 2026; (4) FQHCs with established mobile crisis programs (especially in LA, SF, Sacramento, San Diego, Bay Area) should track whether the May 14 Revise confirms, accelerates, or pulls back this shift. Pairs with Newsom $5.8B BHCIP cumulative announcement and Lodi Wellness Center closure as the BH funding-reshuffle cluster.
On May 6, 2026, Salud Para La Gente — a Santa Cruz/Monterey County FQHC serving low-income patients across the Central Coast — agreed to pay $750,000 to settle False Claims Act allegations that it billed Medi-Cal and Medicaid for misbranded contraceptives. This is the FIRST California FQHC FCA settlement of FY2026 to surface, and it arrives during peak DOJ enforcement posture (NFED stood up April 7, West Coast Strike Force April 30, FY2025 healthcare = 84% of $6.8B FCA recoveries). Even mission-driven safety-net FQHCs are not exempt from FCA scrutiny — particularly around 340B/family planning drug supply chains, FDA labeling verification, and Medicaid billing alignment. Compliance officers across CA FQHCs should immediately: (1) audit contraceptive and 340B drug procurement chains for FDA-approved labeling, (2) verify Medi-Cal billing reflects the actual product dispensed, (3) document GPO/wholesaler verification procedures, (4) review the DOJ-OIG release language for additional indicators. Pairs with the May 7 Section 504 extension as a one-two signal: OCR pulled back on accessibility enforcement, but DOJ/OIG enforcement on billing integrity is intensifying.
Bay Area Community Health (BACH, Fremont/San Jose, ~30 sites) confirmed (May 6, 2026 substitute notice + class action investigation update) PHI exposure via TriZetto Provider Solutions (Cognizant subsidiary, OCHIN clearinghouse partner). Exposed: SSN, Medicare beneficiary numbers, DOB, insurance data. Part of the broader 3.4M-patient TriZetto breach. Class-action investigations active in May 2026. Distinct from already-tracked AltaMed and La Clinica breaches — third-party vendor risk pattern across FQHCs using OCHIN/TriZetto stack. Tech-stack relevance: TriZetto is a widely used FQHC RCM clearinghouse. Strategic implication for FQHC CIOs / compliance officers: (1) audit your full Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain — clearinghouses, RCM vendors, eligibility verifiers, and any subcontractors that touch PHI; (2) TriZetto/Cognizant-related contract review is now a board-level item; (3) confirm your incident-response runbook covers vendor-side breach notification (60-day OCR HIPAA window); (4) document your Security Rule risk analysis updates (the OCR ransomware sweep April 23 and now this BACH item form a one-two compliance pressure pattern).
SEIU 1021 announced (May 6, 2026) a worker/community rally on May 13, 2026, 12:00-1:00 PM at SE Mission Geriatric Clinic (3905 Mission St, SF) opposing the already-tracked Cole, Larkin, and Mission Geriatric clinic closures. All CCSF union members invited. Signals coalition formation around safety-net cuts — pairs with prior SEIU 1021 + IFPTE 21 SF General rally already tracked. Strategic implication for Bay Area FQHCs (San Francisco Community Health Center, Lyon-Martin Community Health Services, Mission Neighborhood Health Center): (1) DPH clinic closures = immediate patient overflow risk; (2) labor coalition formation may extend into FQHC bargaining unit organizing if the closures cascade; (3) operations directors should monitor patient transfer requests in the Mission, Tenderloin, and Inner Sunset districts. Pairs with Lodi Wellness closure as the May 2026 BH/safety-net workforce contraction signal.
Santa Clara County released its FY2026-27 budget May 1, 2026 with the Behavioral Health Services Department (BHSD) facing a fresh $100M shortfall and 218 vacant position eliminations — coming on top of the already-announced $183M Valley Healthcare cuts. Affects Gardner Health Services, School Health Clinics of Santa Clara County, and Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley as county-contracted BH providers. Critical context: Measure A sales tax (passed Nov 2024, 57% approval, $330M/yr) was supposed to offset federal Medicaid cuts but appears insufficient against the compound funding loss. Strategic implication: (1) FQHC BH directors should confirm which county-contracted BH services are at risk of cutbacks, (2) ECM and Community Supports referral pathways into county-funded BH crisis services should be reviewed for continuity, (3) Crisis Now / 988 system continuity is a top advocacy issue alongside ballot Measure A reauthorization conversations.